Referring back to a post from about 4 months ago on the problem of speaking in tongues dealt with in Acts and Corinthians, there this.
It’s long. I haven’t been able to read it all yet, but from scanning it, it looks good. The author seems to take a quite exegetical approach to the question at hand, which I think is the most appropriate. As any philosopher would assert, it’s fruitless to prove something exists by making use of that something in your proof. If it doesn’t exist, then your proof is a lie. If it does, then your proof really shows nothing.
Loading ...